So is today's Supreme Court ruling a victory for Obama? I think it is more of a blessing in disguise for Romney. As I wrote before, whichever side loses in this ruling will be galvanized for the November election. Romney already has seen contributions to his campaign jumped today. He now can complain about Obama care for the rest of the campaign whereas if the law was struck down it will not be an issue for him at all. He says he will repeal the law the day he takes office. Of course it won't be that easy even if Republicans win the senate also. Remember filibuster? Of course there is the little problem that Romney care was the blueprint of Obama care even to the letter of individual mandate. Now Romney says that he may keep provisions like no turning people away for preexisting conditions while doing away with individual mandate. It is obvious that won't work because of there is no individual mandate but you can get insurance even if you have preexisting conditions, then you would not get insurance until you are sick!
Obama care is not a great piece of legislation. But due to pull from both sides it was the only thing that could have passed. There was no upside politically for Obama. Most people have insurance so it is hard to get a majority of people to understand that reform of healthcare is absolutely necessary. Given the main goal of Republicans is to defeat Obama, this big legislation is certainly a target for the Republicans to shoot at. Of course if they have no ideas of their own that is politically viable so they don't even try. Witness Paul Ryan's idea of trying to reform Medicare, Democrats didn't even have to attack it. The Republicans' idea to improve the insurance situation is to let people buy insurance out of state! Yeah, that is really going to make a difference.
With all the Republican arguing about government interference in health care, did they not remember their roles in increasing government's role? It was Reagan who signed into law that mandate hospitals to treat people walking into ER even if they can't pay. You know somebody has to pay for that care or hospitals would go out of business. So hospitals charge people who have money more and try to get more out of private insurance. Government also has to subsidized hospitals with lots of uninsured patients or many would have gone out of business. This mandate for hospitals was supported by both Republicans and Democrats. George Bush also enacted the prescription drug law which caused billions of taxpayers money and which enriched the drug companies and insurance companies that run the program. So Republicans are like the old people who put up signs like "Keep the government out of my Medicare." It is laughable.
I don't know if health care if a right. After all if you have no water or food you will die quicker than if you don't have a doctor but water and food are not free. But if the majority say that health care is a right then we can't have these patch work of insurances and mandates. We have the best trained doctors and best technologies in the world but we are mediocre in life expectancy and infant mortality. So even if you have insurance right now you know the system is broke and needs major overhaul. So it is time to stop the bickering and try to improve Obama care instead.
By the way, even though John Robert's decisions was a complete surprise, LA Times had predicted that it was a possibility because one of his friends who sits on the Appeals Court in Washington had upheld the law with the same tax reasoning. That judge was also a Bush appointee.
I am surprised at how divided everyone is on this issue. I am equally surprised at how much backlash the Supreme Court is getting from its decision.
ReplyDeleteI personally have no idea if I support Obamacare. The only thing I am concerned about is the rising cost of health care in this country.
Hopefully the act will help with this, though I am not so positive since insurance companies are out to gouge the public and make money.
I don't think that health care is a right, but I think it should be affordable and possibly regulated. Ideally, it would be great to have hospitals where people without insurance (or really the means to pay for health care) could go, that is funded by private donations but I don't think this is possible on a large scale.
I don't agree with people saying that they don't want to pay for someone else's health care. Well, if you pay for insurance, you're already paying. It's the people who don't have it now, but can afford it, who will be paying.
Also, from what I understand, is that if you don't have the means to buy insurance, you will not be fined. So, like anything else, there is no incentive for some people who will work the system and not get employed.
Politically, you are right about Obama not getting much help on the decision. Romney will get a boost here and I already heard he raised over 2 million just last night.
Obama will need to capitalize during the debates that the act is very similar in nature to the one Romney signed in Massachusetts.
Romney did the right thing by going to Washington and making a big deal out of saying he'll repeal it when he gets in office. This of course, is a promise he may not be able to keep but it's a good sound bite. And if anyone is fooled by listening to this sound bite, well, they are a fool.
-LBOAYM
The whole idea of individual mandate is somehow taking your freedom is nonsense. You buy a car, you have to have insurance. You own a trucking company, you have to buy insurance. Unless someone dies suddenly, we will be health care consumer sometime. No insurance and you are probably not going to get a checkup until you are very sick, then you end up in a hospital where they have to treat you. Is that fair?
ReplyDeleteNow some people will say: "I will pay for my health care out of my pocket because I can afford it even if it is hundreds and thousands of dollars. I just don't believe that I should be forced to pay for insurance." Well, if you actually can afford to pay hundreds of thousands then you can afford to pay a penalty, er tax, as defined by Justice Roberts. You know the fine or tax is only $95 in 2015 and increase to $695 in 2017! What a deal. Just pay the fine and then you can walk into a hospital when you are having a heart attack and they will have to save your life. It is a mandate by the government on hospitals and the cardiologist on call the night you come in! Or when the doctor tells you that you are going to a heart attack, go get an insurance policy then. No rejection from preexisting conditions! So these people should shut up about losing their freedom because of this law!
It's all about politics at this point. Let's face it, the Republicans have not come up with a viable plan for over 12 years. If they had done something in the Bush years, we wouldn't have to bite the bullet right now.
ReplyDeleteHealth care costs in this country needs to be fixed and I am sure it would be better to do it now than later.
The one plan I remember from the Republicans was to privatize health care which I am sure would be a disaster.
The latest polls show that over 55% of Americans do not want Obamacare. Is it because people don't know enough about it?
I admit that I do not know everything there is to know about the act. Maybe I am the one that is ignorant?
-LBOAYM