Sunday, March 22, 2015

Lee Kuan Yew, the founding father of Singapore has died.  I consider Lee the greatest leader of a country in the last 50 years.  Although Lee has many critics, Singapore is celebrating its 50 years of independence as a thriving economic powerhouse.  I don't think that in 1965, Lee or anyone else in the world could have predicted that Singapore would survive 50 years let alone be a rich nation.  There was problem with its much larger Muslim neighbor Malaysia.  There was also a restless native population that did not like the idea of being ruled by people of Chinese ancestry.  Lee had to act to protect the country and unify it at the same time.  Given all that and take the country from the third world to be one of the tigers of Asia in less than three decades is a great accomplishment. 

Of course there is the question of individual freedom in Singapore.  Lee did rule with an iron hand.  But when the country became stable and prosperous, Lee did step down even though his influence continued behind the scene.  Obviously laws such as no chewing gum in public will never be accepted in western countries.  But the type of discipline that Lee brought to Singapore helped it survive and thrive.  Lee is the father of the country, literally.  He is the father handing out tough love and the children do well as a result despite resentment.  The difference between him and other dictators is that he did not do it to benefit himself.  He lived frugally and did not become extremely wealthy while the country stayed in poverty.  With his passing, I am sure the laws will gradually loosen up.  Young people of this generation did not grow up in danger or poverty.  They may not appreciate what Lee had to do.  They will demand more individual freedom.  And that would be the right thing for Singapore.  But we must not forget that without Lee, Singaporeans would be living as Muslims under Malaysia today.  They would not have more freedom under that system and certainly will not be as rich.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous7:00 AM

    I don't have anything to say about Lee Kuan Yew. I don't know much about him or Singapore. Though I did have a couple of friends from there in college.

    They seemed to like their country but were always talking about how strict things were there.

    So, I will not say anything about Singapore here. I did, however, run across an article on an artist from Taishan, that is 104 years old. He came to the U.S. when he was a child and was held at Angel Island for an amount of time when he came here.

    I am putting the link to the WSJ article below, which I thought was interesting. I also discovered there was something called the Chinese Exclusion Act. I had never known about this. It is very similar to the things we hear today about immigrants and wondered if maybe we have not learned our lesson.

    I am putting a link to the Wiki page for the act below too.

    WSJ article:

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/from-bambi-to-kites-his-work-flies-high-1427330740

    Chinese Exclusion Act:

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act

    Let me know what you think of these. I knew there was a lot of anti-Chinese sentiment back in the 19th century and early 20th century but never knew the extent.

    -LBAOYM

    ReplyDelete

Use the following html code to make a clickable link in your comment (instructions in the sidebar). You can test the link by previewing your comment.

<a href="http://angryyellowman.blogspot.com">Angry Yellow Man</a>

The above example will display as Angry Yellow Man