Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Looks like North Korea may be testing a second nuclear device soon. This would be no surprise considering all signs point to a less than overwhelming sucessful first attempt. Even such a feeble effort prompted angry reaction from the U.S. and Japan. This was exactly what Kim wanted. This is an ego maniac who wants attention from the world powers. Of course we already believed that Kim has several nuclear devices before this so why should we show any worry over this. Only the South Koreans should worry because they are so close and can be hit easily. Even Japan is too far for North Korea to hit accurately with the missles they have now. The U.S. is in no danger from this in the near future.

There is the argument that North Korea can sell its weapons to terrorists which can then be used against us by way of a dirty bomb. This is possible but not likely. As I said before, Kim is a secular dictator who wants to stay in power and live. He maybe crazy but he is not stupid. Going to bed will Muslim terrorists will mean death to him. The most likely place where terrorists can get nuclear material is still from the former USSR countries and Pakistan. Nothing has changed in these few weeks.

One problem that arise from North Korea thumbing its nose at the world is that Iran will be encouraged to continue its nuclear program. Bush made a terrible mistake by lumping Iraq, Iran and North Korea as the axis of evil and then invaded Iraq. Turns out as expected Hussein had no nuclear weapons and was taken out of power. North Korea has nuclear weapon for sure and there is nothing the U.S. can do about it. Bush had said the world will not tolerate a nuclear North Korea. But all Bush call for now is sanctions. There is no talk of invading North Korea. Iran sees this and figures that the best defense is offense and that having nuclear weapons maybe a deterrent against attack. Since nothing happened to India, Pakistan and now North Korea after they tested nuclear weapons, why wouldn't Iran pursue its program? There is no turning back now. Preemptive strikes and threats that cannot be back up will leave a more unstable world in the future.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous10:12 AM

    I agree with your blog, especially your theory on Iran. I find it almost comical that when Kim has been out of the spotlight for a while that he all of the sudden shows up. It's like a "hey everybody, look at me...don't forget me!"
    What I find ironic is the stance that the Bush administration is taking with N. Korea. Is it me or do I find it absurd that we went to Iraq on the basis that we assumed there were WMD's but we're going the diplomatic route with N. Korea?

    To me, this just proves that Bush thought he'd pick on Iraq for the sake of picking on it. I am convinced that the administration never thought it would be so hard to occupy Iraq.

    I would be interested to see what our stance will be on Iran when the time comes. If I were the leader of Iran (which I am not), I would go ahead and test. Why not? See what the UN does?

    We are spread out too thin in Iraq as it is, let alone the region. I doubt that we would send troops into Iran, unless somehow we could get a UN coalition in there.

    The other thing about the nuke tests were, did anyone notice there were a bunch of earthquakes later that week? Coincidence? I don't think I heard from any news source that linked the two together.

    LBOAYM

    ReplyDelete

Use the following html code to make a clickable link in your comment (instructions in the sidebar). You can test the link by previewing your comment.

<a href="http://angryyellowman.blogspot.com">Angry Yellow Man</a>

The above example will display as Angry Yellow Man