Sunday, September 29, 2019

Another day of violence in Hong Kong as the protest there is on the 17th week.  As China's national day on Oct. 1st approaches, we can expect more violence over the next few days.  As a former Hong Konger who is now an American, I wish to give advice to both the protesters and the authorities in Hong Kong and China.  I know nobody on either side have any interest in what I have to say.  But I am going to say it anyway.  So here is an open letter to the protesters, particularly the young ones.  Later on will be an open letter to the authorities.

Dear Protesters: 

I know the overwhelming majority of you are peaceful people who just want to protest without causing damages to Hong Kong and injuring innocent people.  You also do not want to be injured or arrested.  But the problem is there are people among you who are dangerous and is causing havoc that have led to violence.  While you may believe it is the police who are causing the violence, I don't see it that way.

I live near LA.  If a million people are out in the street of LA protesting and some of them crash their way into the city council building, raise foreign flags, sing foreign national anthems, burn the American flag, shut down LAX, shut down some of the subway (although we don't have those here), throw Molotov cocktails, petrol bombs and bricks, what do you think the LAPD would do?  It would be much worse than the tear gas and water cannon that the Hong Kong police have used.  In 17 weeks there would be death at the hands of the police here for sure.

A few weeks ago French police were using the same tactics against protesters at the G7 summit.  There were only a few hundred protesters at that time, hardly a threat.  Do you remember the tactics the French police used against the Yellow Vests protesters last year?  Way more number of and severity of injuries then than those in Hong Kong now.  But was there complaints by other western nations against the French police?  I think the Hong Kong police have been rather restrained in comparison.

Some of you are worried that Carrie Lamb will use the Emergency Regulations Ordinance against you.  This is a draconian law that basically lets the Chief Executive do whatever she wants.  But you do know this is not a Chinese law but a law left over from British colonial rule?  It was put into law to stop the Chinese seamen who were protesting that their white counterparts were making several times as much money.  This rule was used in 1967 in the leftist riots by the British forces.  If the British were so worried about human rights in Hong Kong, why didn't they repeal the law all these years, particularly when they handed Hong Kong over to China?

I understand that many of you don't like the policies of China.  But I don't understand why you would raise the British or American flags and sing their national anthems.  The rights that you demand from China were not given to you by the British until it was obvious that they are going to hand Hong Kong over to China.  This way they can say China is abusing you.  But to the day of the hand over, the people of Hong Kong had no right to vote for their chief executive.  It was a governor appointed by London.  And I don't know of any instance where the U.S. chastise the UK for human rights abuse in Hong Kong or in any other of its former colonies. 

Yes, there are good Americans who are rooting for you.  But the U.S. government have always look for its own self interests above human rights.  The U.S. went to Vietnam to fight the communists.  But did the U.S. protest French colonial rule in Vietnam?  Sure, China should be called out on human rights issues in Tibet and Xinjiang.  But the U.S. is only giving out toothless protests all over the world over human rights.  China gets hit by western nations more than others because it is their biggest competitor for world power.  But you should not believe that any nation, including the U.S. will be of any real help for you.  If China wants to stop U.S. complaints, it will just give Trump a trade deal.  If you don't think money talks, just ask the family and friends of Jamal Khashoggi.

Most of your families originally came from the mainland to have a better life.  I would say that life in China is way better than that of your ancestors before they made their way to Hong Kong.  I would also say that even though you may not think so, I think Hong Kong today is way better than in the 1960s when I left.  Improvements in China and Hong Kong took place slowly.  Those in power do not give it up easily, whether it is communist China or colonial Britain.  The Western nations will give you verbal support but there will not be concrete help.  You have won the extradition bill battle.  It is time to let things go back to normal because there is a minority who will take violence to much higher levels.  This will eventually lead China to put down the hammer.  This will cause damage to Hong Kong that may be impossible to repair.  Good luck.

AYM


2 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:38 PM

    Wow. Totally thought you were going to write about the impeachment process, but went to the other side of the globe. I don't disagree with anything you wrote. I wasn't there in the 60's and only see things from an outside view. However, maybe we are looking at the protests a different way. Maybe they are protesting to keep things from changing. You mentioned that things got better after the Brits started handing things back over to China. Maybe that taste of "freedom" or "democracy" this generation got is all they know and they want to keep it that way.

    I don't know. I've been playing things back and forth about how things are going over there. At times, I side with the protesters, but at other times, I side with the people who are being effected by the violence and stoppages that effect the economy.

    I will say that the violence and destruction makes the protesters look bad, they gain the attention. I also think that if they want change or keep things like they are, maybe there's a different way. I guess we will see.

    -LBOAYM

    ReplyDelete
  2. What you said about taste of freedom is true. That is why we have a divide between the young people who never experienced the life during colonial days and old people like me. My wife's friends who still lives in Hong Kong said that the school curriculum has not changed since they were in high school. This means it is still pro western ideals. (By the way, that shows China has not tried to brainwash the next generation). But the young people take these ideals as the true practice of countries like the UK and the U.S. But for people like us who were there in the 60s know this is bs. The British were not kind to people in HK and in the U.S., blacks were getting beat up in the south and there were riots in Watts and Detroit. So what the young people learn in school is not the same as what we experienced.

    The previous protests revolved around not able to choose their leader. As I said, there were no free choice even at the end of British rule. I have not seen much erosion of other freedoms, many of which were put in just before the handover. The protest leaders are free to talk on tv and newspaper still. There is total free internet in HK. There are no travel restrictions. I understand that people in HK are worried that they will end up like Tibet, Xingjiang or even like rest of China. But I don't think that is likely in the near future since China makes money off HK and wouldn't want to kill the goose that lay the golden egg. But just as the U.S. and UK are competing with China, so is China competing with them. So when the young people are raising the UK and U.S. flags and singing their praises, China will only act more harshly toward them.

    ReplyDelete

Use the following html code to make a clickable link in your comment (instructions in the sidebar). You can test the link by previewing your comment.

<a href="http://angryyellowman.blogspot.com">Angry Yellow Man</a>

The above example will display as Angry Yellow Man